首页> 外文OA文献 >Important considerations for feasibility studies in physical activity research involving persons with multiple sclerosis: a scoping systematic review and case study
【2h】

Important considerations for feasibility studies in physical activity research involving persons with multiple sclerosis: a scoping systematic review and case study

机译:在涉及多发性硬化症的人的体育活动研究中进行可行性研究的重要考虑因素:范围界定的系统回顾和案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background\udMuch research has been undertaken to establish the important benefits of physical activity in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). There is disagreement regarding the strength of this research, perhaps because the majority of studies on physical activity and its benefits have not undergone initial and systematic feasibility testing. We aim to address the feasibility processes that have been examined within the context of physical activity interventions in MS.\ud\udMethod\udA systematic scoping review was conducted based on a literature search of five databases to identify feasibility processes described in preliminary studies of physical activity in MS. We read and extracted methodology from each study based on the following feasibility metrics: process (e.g. recruitment), resource (e.g. monetary costs), management (e.g. personnel time requirements) and scientific outcomes (e.g. clinical/participant reported outcome measures). We illustrate the use of the four feasibility metrics within a randomised controlled trial of a home-based exercise intervention in persons with MS.\ud\udResults\udTwenty-five studies were identified. Resource feasibility (e.g. time and resources) and scientific outcomes feasibility (e.g. clinical outcomes) methodologies were applied and described in many studies; however, these metrics have not been systematically addressed. Metrics related to process feasibility (e.g. recruitment) and management feasibility (e.g. human and data management) are not well described within the literature. Our case study successfully enabled us to address the four feasibility metrics, and we provide new information on management feasibility (i.e. estimate data completeness and estimate data entry) and scientific outcomes feasibility (i.e. determining data collection materials appropriateness).\ud\udConclusion\udOur review highlights the existing research and provides a case study which assesses important metrics of study feasibility. This review serves as a clarion call for feasibility trials that will substantially strengthen the foundation of research on exercise in MS.
机译:背景\ ud已经开展了许多研究来确定多发性硬化症(MS)患者进行体育锻炼的重要益处。关于这项研究的力量存在分歧,可能是因为大多数关于体育活动及其益处的研究尚未经过初步的系统的可行性测试。我们旨在解决在MS的体育活动干预范围内已经检查过的可行性过程。\ ud \ udMethod \ ud基于五个数据库的文献检索进行了系统的范围界定审查,以识别在体育的初步研究中描述的可行性过程MS中的活动。我们基于以下可行性指标从每项研究中读取并提取了方法学:流程(例如招聘),资源(例如金钱成本),管理(例如人员时间要求)和科学成果(例如临床/参与​​者报告的成果指标)。我们举例说明了在以MS为基础的家庭运动干预的随机对照试验中使用这四个可行性指标。\ ud \ udResults \ ud有25项研究。在许多研究中都采用和描述了资源可行性(例如时间和资源)和科学成果可行性(例如临床成果)方法;但是,这些指标尚未得到系统地解决。在文献中没有很好地描述与过程可行性(例如,招聘)和管理可行性(例如,人员和数据管理)有关的度量。我们的案例研究成功地使我们能够解决这四个可行性指标,并且我们提供了有关管理可行性(即估计数据完整性和估计数据输入)和科学成果可行性(即确定数据收集材料的适当性)的新信息。\ ud \ ud结论\ udOur综述重点介绍了现有研究,并提供了一个案例研究,以评估研究可行性的重要指标。这项审查是对可行性试验的号召,它将大大加强MS运动研究的基础。

著录项

  • 作者

    Learmonth, Y.C.; Motl, R.W.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2018
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号